FPÖ club chairman Herbert Kickl, himself a staunch non-smoker, criticized the anti-freedom sentiments behind this measure.

Criticism from the FPÖ

FPÖ club chairman Herbert Kickl, himself a staunch non-smoker, criticized the anti-freedom sentiment behind this measure. However, he could «» not do anything with the patronizing spirit contained in this legislative resolution. The previous regulation was characterized by mutual tolerance and had guaranteed all guests – whether smokers or non-smokers – a stay in restaurants that met their needs.

Local would be closed in advance for fear of high sales losses. «The fact that the innkeepers are now also held accountable when guests who smoke in front of their restaurant disturb the night’s sleep for residents is downright legal prank», says Kickl. He received support from the liberal tourism spokesman Gerald Hauser: «» But we will continue to fight so that the general smoking ban is toned down. The goal must be that the restaurateurs continue to have a certain freedom of choice – for example in the case of a closed society or by restricting the serving places. «»

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

On Friday, the absolute ban on smoking in restaurants will come into force – and will draw a line under a story that has been discussed longer than Brexit. Originally decided by the red-black coalition, it was tipped by the turquoise-blue government in order to be decided by parliament in the game of free forces after a referendum and the Ibiza affair. Especially in Vienna they want to take tough action.

Whether everyone adheres to the new regulations is not checked across the board. According to the Ministry of Health, the «» supervisory bodies «» in accordance with the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act as well as those officials who have to comply with trade regulations and the labor inspections are responsible. As a survey showed, the smoking ban is mostly only checked in parallel to the other tasks.

Only Vienna’s city councilor Ulli Sima (SPÖ) has announced that the market office and the group will immediately take tough action for immediate measures: «» There is no grace period. «» In addition, every private citizen is free to report violations to the police, who then have to intervene. The impending penalties are quite hefty: the first report costs 800 euros, the absolute maximum penalty is 10,000 euros for repeat offenders.https://123helpme.me/

Rapid positive effects expected

The smoking ban should quickly show positive effects on health – 623 fewer hospital stays within one week. The Graz social medicine specialist Florian Stigler has transferred the experiences of other countries to Austria. «» International studies have shown that smoke-free restaurants reduced heart attacks by an average of 15 percent, strokes by 16 percent and pneumonia by 24 percent. «»

Appropriate to the topic – Gastro chairman: «» We are economically neutered «»

An application by the so-called «» Nacht-Gastronomie «» to exclude them in front of their restaurants because of the possible nuisance to residents by smokers was thrown out at the Constitutional Court in mid-October. The Constitutional Court refused to deal with the application because the legislature had not exceeded the legislature’s leeway in terms of policy. A decision is still pending on the appeal of the Association of Shisha Bar Operators Austria (VSBÖ), who argue that nobody comes to them for any other purpose than to smoke a water pipe.

Criticism from the FPÖ

FPÖ club chairman Herbert Kickl, himself a staunch non-smoker, criticized the anti-freedom sentiment behind this measure. However, he could «» not do anything with the patronizing spirit contained in this legislative resolution. The previous regulation was characterized by mutual tolerance and had guaranteed all guests – whether smokers or non-smokers – a stay in restaurants that met their needs.

Local would be closed in advance for fear of high sales losses. «» The fact that the innkeepers are now also held accountable when guests who smoke in front of their restaurant disturb the night’s sleep for residents is almost a legal prank, «» says Kickl. He received support from the liberal tourism spokesman Gerald Hauser: «» But we will continue to fight so that the general smoking ban is toned down. The aim must be that the restaurateurs continue to have a certain freedom of choice – for example in the case of a closed society or by restricting the serving places. «»

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

On Friday, the absolute ban on smoking in restaurants will come into force – and will draw a line under a story that has been discussed longer than Brexit. Originally decided by the red-black coalition, it was tipped by the turquoise-blue government in order to be decided by parliament in the game of free forces after a referendum and the Ibiza affair. Especially in Vienna they want to take tough action.

Whether everyone adheres to the new regulations is not checked across the board. According to the Ministry of Health, the «» supervisory bodies «» in accordance with the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act as well as those officials who have to comply with trade regulations and the labor inspections are responsible. As a survey showed, the smoking ban is mostly only checked in parallel to the other tasks.

Only Vienna’s city councilor Ulli Sima (SPÖ) has announced that the market office and the group will immediately take tough action for immediate measures: «» There is no grace period. «» In addition, every private individual is free to report violations to the police, who then have to intervene. The impending penalties are quite hefty: the first report costs 800 euros, the absolute maximum penalty is 10,000 euros for repeat offenders.

Rapid positive effects expected

The smoking ban should quickly show positive effects on health – 623 fewer hospital stays within one week. The Graz social medicine specialist Florian Stigler has transferred the experiences of other countries to Austria. «» International studies showed that a smoke-free restaurant reduced heart attacks by an average of 15 percent, strokes by 16 percent and pneumonia by 24 percent. «»

Appropriate to the topic – Gastro chairman: «» We are economically neutered «»

An application by the so-called «» Nacht-Gastronomie «» to exclude them in front of their restaurants because of the possible nuisance to residents by smokers was thrown out at the Constitutional Court in mid-October. The Constitutional Court refused to deal with the application because the legislature had not exceeded the legislature’s leeway in terms of policy. A decision is still pending on the objection of the Association of Shisha Bar Operators Austria (VSBÖ), who argue that nobody comes to them for any other purpose than to smoke a water pipe.

Criticism from the FPÖ

FPÖ club chairman Herbert Kickl, himself a staunch non-smoker, criticized the anti-freedom sentiment behind this measure. However, he could «» not do anything with the patronizing spirit contained in this legislative resolution. The previous regulation was characterized by mutual tolerance and had guaranteed all guests – whether smokers or non-smokers – a stay in restaurants that met their needs.

Local would be closed in advance for fear of high sales losses. «» The fact that the innkeepers are now also held accountable when guests who smoke in front of their restaurant disturb the night’s sleep for residents is almost a legal prank, «» says Kickl. He received support from the liberal tourism spokesman Gerald Hauser: «» But we will continue to fight so that the general smoking ban is toned down. The goal must be that the restaurateurs continue to have a certain freedom of choice – for example in the case of a closed society or by restricting the serving places. «»

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

On Friday, the absolute ban on smoking in restaurants will come into force – and will draw a line under a story that has been discussed longer than Brexit. Originally decided by the red-black coalition, it was tipped by the turquoise-blue government in order to be decided by parliament in the game of free forces after a referendum and the Ibiza affair. Especially in Vienna they want to take tough action.

Whether everyone adheres to the new regulations is not checked across the board. According to the Ministry of Health, the «» supervisory bodies «» in accordance with the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act as well as those officials who have to comply with trade regulations and the labor inspections are responsible. As a survey showed, the smoking ban is mostly only checked in parallel to the other tasks.

Only Vienna’s city councilor Ulli Sima (SPÖ) has announced that the market office and the group will immediately take tough action for immediate measures: «» There is no grace period. «» In addition, every private citizen is free to report violations to the police, who then have to intervene. The impending penalties are quite hefty: the first report costs 800 euros, the absolute maximum penalty is 10,000 euros for repeat offenders.

Rapid positive effects expected

The smoking ban should quickly show positive effects on health – 623 fewer hospital stays within one week. The Graz social medicine specialist Florian Stigler has transferred the experiences of other countries to Austria. «» International studies showed that a smoke-free restaurant reduced heart attacks by an average of 15 percent, strokes by 16 percent and pneumonia by 24 percent. «»

Appropriate to the topic – Gastro chairman: «» We are economically neutered «»

An application by the so-called «» Nacht-Gastronomie «» to exclude them in front of their restaurants because of the possible nuisance to residents by smokers was thrown out at the Constitutional Court in mid-October. The Constitutional Court refused to deal with the application because the legislature had not exceeded the legislature’s leeway in terms of policy. A decision is still pending on the objection of the Association of Shisha Bar Operators Austria (VSBÖ), who argue that nobody comes to them for any other purpose than to smoke a water pipe.

Criticism from the FPÖ

FPÖ club chairman Herbert Kickl, himself a staunch non-smoker, criticized the anti-freedom sentiment behind this measure. However, he could «» not do anything with the patronizing spirit contained in this legislative resolution. The previous regulation was characterized by mutual tolerance and had guaranteed all guests – whether smokers or non-smokers – a stay in restaurants that met their needs.

Local would be closed in advance for fear of high sales losses. «The fact that the innkeepers are now also held accountable when guests who smoke in front of their restaurant disturb the night’s sleep for residents is downright legal prank», says Kickl. He received support from the liberal tourism spokesman Gerald Hauser: «» But we will continue to fight so that the general smoking ban is toned down. The goal must be that the restaurateurs continue to have a certain freedom of choice – for example in the case of a closed society or by restricting the serving places. «»

Read news for 1 month now for free! * * The test ends automatically. More on this ▶Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at) New access (yachtrevue.at) 8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at) Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto .at) In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (trend.at) The 35 best family series for laughing and feeling good (tv-media.at) E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and Prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

On Friday, the absolute ban on smoking in restaurants will come into force – and will draw a line under a story that has been discussed longer than Brexit. Originally decided by the red-black coalition, it was tipped by the turquoise-blue government in order to be decided by parliament in the game of free forces after a referendum and the Ibiza affair. Especially in Vienna they want to take tough action.

Whether everyone adheres to the new regulations is not checked across the board. According to the Ministry of Health, the «» supervisory bodies «» in accordance with the Food Safety and Consumer Protection Act as well as those officials who have to comply with trade regulations and the labor inspections are responsible. As a survey showed, the smoking ban is mostly only checked in parallel to the other tasks.

Only Vienna’s city councilor Ulli Sima (SPÖ) has announced that the market office and the group will immediately take tough action for immediate measures: «» There is no grace period. «» In addition, every private citizen is free to report violations to the police, who then have to intervene.